Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Inherent variability in airway characteristics of simulation manikins: is it time we standardised assessments of crisis management skills?
  1. Balakrishnan Ashokka1,
  2. Krishnasamy Narendiran2,
  3. Abhijit Bhattacharya3,
  4. Dinker Pai4,
  5. Shen Liang5,6,
  6. Shoba Subramanian2,
  7. Ernest T Larmie3,
  8. Fun Gee Chen1
  1. 1Department of Anaesthesia, National University of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
  2. 2Centre for Simulation, Taylor University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  3. 3Clinical Skills Centre, AIMST University, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia
  4. 4Jurong Health Simulation and Clinical Education Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  5. 5National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  6. 6Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Dr Balakrishnan Ashokka, Department of Anaesthesia, National University of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore 117597, Singapore; ashokkab{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction Learning of simulation-based crisis management skills involves technologically advanced manikins and use of automated scenarios. Progressions in preprogrammed scenarios require finite task completion such as successful airway intubations for achieving optimal learning outcomes aligned to curricular goals. The study was set to explore the existing variability among various simulation manikins in use at our institute for undergraduate medical education.

Methods 56 final-year undergraduate students, who had received prior training in airway management skills, performed intubations on each of the 5 different manikins (56×5=280 intubations). The manikins used were the Human Patient Simulator (HPS), iStan & Emergency Care Simulator (ECS) from CAE Healthcare and Mega Code Kelly (MCK) and Airway Trainer (AWTR) from Laerdal. The students’ performances were compared for success rates, ease of intubation, grade of laryngeal visualisation and presence of tooth injury on the manikins, Data from the intubations were cross-tabulated and evaluated by general estimating equation analysis using the Poisson model.

Results iStan had the higher rates of failure to intubate (64.3%). iStan (62.5%) and HPS (57.1%) had statistically significant teeth injury (p<0.0001) compared to other manikins. HPS and AWTR had the least difficult grades of laryngeal visualisation (Cormack Lehane grades 1 and 2), while the most difficult grade of visualisation (Cormack Lehane grades 3 and 4) was reported in ECS (44.6%).

Conclusions Each of the high-technology manikins used in automated scenarios for crisis management teaching and learning has heterogeneity in airway features. Since frequent airway management is a critical component of simulation scenarios, this can affect student performance when these manikins are used for formative and summative high-stakes assessments.

  • Assessment of crisis management skills
  • Simulation based learning

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.