Article Text

PDF
Residents’ use of mobile technologies: three challenges for graduate medical education
  1. Anna MacLeod,
  2. Cathy Fournier
  1. Division of Medical Education, Nova Scotia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anna MacLeod, Division of Medical Education, Nova ScotiaNova Scotia, Dalhousie University 5849, Halifax, Canada; anna.macleod{at}dal.ca

Abstract

Introduction The practice of medicine involves, among other things, managing ambiguity, interpreting context and making decisions in the face of uncertainty. These uncertainties, amplified for learners, can be negotiated in a variety of ways; however, the promise, efficiency and availability of mobile technologies and clinical decision supports make these tools an appealing way to manage ambiguity.

Mobile technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent in medical education and in the practice of medicine. Because of this, we explored how the use of mobile technologies is influencing residents’ experiences of graduate medical education.

Methods We conducted an 18-month qualitative investigation to explore this issue. Our research was conceptually and theoretically framed in sociomaterial studies of professional learning. Specifically, our methods included logging of technology use and related reflexive writing by residents (n=10), interviews with residents (n=12) and interviews with faculty (n=6).

Results We identified three challenges for graduate medical education related to mobile technology use: (1) efficiency versus critical thinking; (2) patient context versus evidence-based medicine and (3) home/work-life balance.

Discussion In this digital age, decontextualised knowledge is readily available. Our data indicate that rather than access to accurate knowledge, the more pressing challenge for medical educators is managing how, when and why learners choose to access that information.

  • mobile technologies
  • graduate medical education
  • ethnography

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors AM is the first author. In addition to participating in data collection and analysis, she led the planning and writing of the paper. C

    F participated in data collection and analysis. She also reviewed and commented on drafts of this paper.

  • Funding Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Medical Education Research Grant.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Dalhousie University Social Science and Humanities Research Ethics Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.