Article info

Download PDFPDF

Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators

Authors

  • Christopher U Cates Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Vascular Intervention, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Lars Lönn Department of Radiology and Vascular Surgery, National Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Anthony G Gallagher Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Vascular Intervention, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA ASSERT Centre, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork T12 DX01, Ireland PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anthony G Gallagher, ASSERT Centre, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Room 2.103B School of Medicine, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, Cork, Ireland; ag.gallagher{at}ucc.ie
View Full Text

Citation

Cates CU, Lönn L, Gallagher AG
Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators

Publication history

  • Accepted January 19, 2016
  • First published February 8, 2016.
Online issue publication 
March 03, 2016

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.