Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evaluating the fidelity of a novel part-task trainer for emergency front of neck access training
  1. Richard James Berwick,
  2. Simon Jude Mercer,
  3. Peter Groom
  1. Department of Anaesthesia, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Richard James Berwick, Department of Anaesthesia, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK; berwick.rj{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

In 2015, the British Difficult Airway Society (DAS) revised its guidelines for managing an unanticipated difficult airway, recommending surgical cricothyroidotomy as the new standard emergency front of neck access (FONA).1 In the UK, the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists recommended anaesthetists to undergo frequent FONA training using simulation.2 Fidelity in simulation has physical, functional and psychological components,3 and we feel that the Crico-Trainer (Frova; VMB Medical, Newcastle, UK), currently used in our department, could be improved. A prestudy survey (n=15) of attending (consultant) anaesthetists identified ‘ideal manikin qualities’. This confirmed that important features were high-fidelity feel of: tissue (80.0%), scalpel incision (86.7%) and surface (80.0%). The ability to intubate (60.0%), haemorrhage (46.7%) and mimic an impalpable cricothyroid membrane (46.7%) were also considered important. The Frova was deemed to lack realistic tissue planes (80.0%), component feel (66.7%) and haemorrhage (46.7%). The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate our own trainer, focusing on improved fidelity.

Methods

We designed and constructed our part-task trainer (figure 1) using a wooden base, proprietary reusable plastic ‘larynx/trachea’ and a novel disposable ‘neck tissue’ prosthesis, which feels realistic and bleeds when cut. The neck was fabricated from a viscoelastic polymer (Akton; Action Products, Leek, UK) coated in acrylic paint (Daler-Rowney, Bracknell, UK) and …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors All listed authors, RJB, SJM and PG, participated in study concept, writing and revision of the manuscript. RJB was responsible for the manikin design and construction, study concept, initial study development, data collection, analysis, drafting and revision of this work. All authors accept responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of this work.

  • Funding This work received funding for materials to build the manikin prototypes. This was from the Aintree Anaesthetic Department, Difficult Airway Course Fund. There was no additional specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.