Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Near-peer interprofessional simulation training in an undergraduate setting
  1. Matthew Young1,
  2. Tansy Wilkinson2
  1. 1 Emergency Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
  2. 2 Postgraduate Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew Young, Emergency Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro TR1 3LJ, UK; matt.young0611{at}


To assess the effectiveness of near-peer educators to improve human factors education for medical and nursing students managing an unwell simulated patient. 12 medical and eight nursing students volunteered. Doctors and nurses qualified for less than 2 years were used to run and debrief the sessions. Self-assessment Likert-scale questionnaires, focussing on topics related to human factors along with differences between near-peer and senior-led simulation sessions, were used before and after the intervention. The results showed an improvement in every question for topics related to human factors. The highest post-programme scores were in escalation of care and knowing professional role or limitations. Students scored near-peers highly in relation to relevance to practice, content covered and approachability. The post-programme questionnaires show students prefer near-peer to senior-led simulation sessions. The interprofessional nature was well received. Our project differs from traditional undergraduate simulation, where students can act out of the role they are training in. Near-peer educators appear to be more approachable and cover content more relevant to clinical practice compared with senior staff. Improvements were seen in every human factor related field.

  • simulation
  • interprofessional
  • teaching
  • near-peer
View Full Text

Statistics from


  • Contributors MY was involved in the questionnaire design, data collection and analysis. TW was involved in organising volunteer students and debriefers. Both authors contributed to the project design, running the simulations and writing up the final project.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.