Introduction Competency-based medical education (CBME) is a system of medical training that focuses on a structured approach to developing the clinical abilities of medical education graduates and practicing physicians. CBME requires a robust and multifaceted system of assessment in order to both measure and guide the progress of learners toward pre-established goals. Simulation has been proposed as one method for assessing competency in healthcare workers. However, a longitudinal framework for assessing competency using simulation has not been developed.
Methods Conjecture mapping methodology was used to map Miller’s framework for competency assessment—‘knows’, ‘knows how’, ‘shows how’, and ‘does’—to the five SimZones described by Roussin and Weinstock. The SimZones describe a system of organising the development and delivery of simulation-based education and offer a foundation for both guiding and organising assessment in a simulation context.
Results A conceptualised alignment of the SimZones with Miller’s pyramid of assessment was developed, as well as a detailed conjecture map. SimZone 0 (auto-feedback) and SimZone 1 (foundational instruction) mapped to ‘knows’ and ‘knows how’. SimZone 2 (acute care instruction) mapped to ‘shows how’. SimZone 3 (team and system development) mapped to ‘shows how’. SimZone 4 (real-life debriefing and development) mapped to ‘does’.
Conclusion The SimZones system of competency assessment offers a robust, flexible, and multifaceted system to guide both formative and summative assessment in CBME. The SimZones approach adds to the many methods of competency assessment available to educators. Adding SimZones to the vocabulary of CBME may be helpful for the full deployment of CBME.
- competency-based medical education
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors CR, TS substantially contributed to the conception and design of the work; drafting the work; final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. PW substantially contributed to the conception and design of the work; critically revising the work for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.