Statistics from Altmetric.com
Simulation has garnered success in healthcare through its ability to teach professionals technical and non-technical skills without exposing patients to the novice practitioner.1
In situ simulation takes this teaching technique into the workplace, using the real systems, equipment and workforce. A significant benefit of in situ simulation is the testing of healthcare systems without exposing a patient to indolent risks that have the potential to cause delays and harm. The source of these risks can be related to deficits in training, resources, environment, processes or protocols. These risks can be difficult to identify without a live test of the system.2
The harm from these latent safety threats (LSTs) can be averted if identified through in situ simulation and rectified before a patient is exposed. Research has suggest that in situ simulation is superior in eliciting these LSTs over laboratory-based simulation.3
By identifying safety threats it is possible to demonstrate a quantitative impact on patient safety.
At the Royal Cornwall Hospital, a rural district general trust, we have used a custom-made database to record and manage these LSTs, making it an integral part of our simulation training.
In 2017, the simulation department at Royal Cornwall Hospital designed a database to record and respond to significant LSTs that arise during in situ simulation.
LSTs are identified during a scenario debrief. This is recorded on a paper form, along with details of the simulation, location …
Collaborators Mr S Harris: Lead Simulation Practitioner, Royal Cornwall Hospital, firstname.lastname@example.org; Mr K Huddy: Simulation Practitioner, Royal Cornwall Hospital, email@example.com
Contributors BP: conception of the project, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. GM: conception of the database reporting system and acquisition of data. LF and LC: analysis and interpretation of the data. Kieren Huddy and Steve Harris: acquisition of the data. The draft version was produced by BP. All authors were involved in revising the draft and giving approval for it to be published. All authors take responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the published work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.