Statistics from Altmetric.com
‘They’re called what? Standardised patients—you must be kidding. That’s so dehumanising!’ [Patient advocate being oriented to healthcare simulation practices]
We welcome the invitation from Sanko et al (2020) to seek clarity of terms used to describe what we know as ‘simulated participants’.1 While seeking a common language has great value as Sanko et al eloquently describe, we place even greater value on the use of inclusive, respectful and sensitive language.
For over 15 years, the authors have variously flagged issues associated with the use of the terms simulated patient and standardised patient.2–5 Our argument with using standardised before the word patient is that it is in tension with values of patient-centredness and person-centredness and, …
Contributors DN developed the content, drafted and then revised the letter, approved the final version and is accountable for the integrity of the work. PM, LNC and GG, revised the content, approved the final version and is accountable for the integrity of the work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.